Mostrar 66 resultados

Objeto informacional
Bank of Toronto vs Smart Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.34 · Dossiê/Processo · 1857
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a summons in the case of Bank of Toronto vs. Robert Wallace Smart et al. Case regarding a promissory note owed between the defendants to the plaintiff.

Sem título
Bank of Upper Canada Notice of Taxation
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.12 · Dossiê/Processo · 1855
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a Bank of Upper Canada Notice of Taxation to Charles McFadden, Henry D. Rowe (1825-1907) and Joseph Symons (1815-1970).

Sem título
Bank of Upper Canada vs Conger et al Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.49 · Dossiê/Processo · 1860
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a notice of Plead Declaration regarding the Bank of Upper Canada vs. Conger et al, 1860. Alfred Rubidge represented the Bank of Upper Canada; and George Brogdin represented Wilson Seymour Conger, James Ashford, Robert Mitchell (1798-1865) and John Ashford (d. 1869).

Sem título
Barrett Jr. vs Dean Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.5 · Dossiê/Processo · 1854
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a document regarding money owed to William Barrett Jr., by Matthew Dean, 1854. The money was borrowed in 1845.

Sem título
Bradley vs Elliott et al Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.52 · Dossiê/Processo · 1861
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a warrant in the case of Bradley vs. Elliott et al, 1861. Plaintiff, Alexander Bradley was represented by J. H. Boulton. Defendants, George Elliott, Abraham Culin and David Carson (1829-1873)were represented by George Brogdin. The warrant to the defendant Abraham Culin authorizing him to seize the goods of one Robert Johnston for rent due to George Elliott, and under which warrants two seizures and sales took place.

Sem título
Brock et al vs Ashford et al Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.39 · Dossiê/Processo · 1858
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of papers related to Brock et al vs. Ashford et al (Samuel P. Brock, Perry S. Steele and Hiram C. Newman vs. James and John Ashford of Hamilton Township).

Sem título
Brogdin and Boulton Correspondence
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.65 · Dossiê/Processo · 1848-1867
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of correspondence received by the firm of George Brogdin, and later Brogdin & Boulton between 1848 and 1867.

Sem título
Brogdin and Boulton Financial Records
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.37 · Dossiê/Processo · 1857
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of various cancelled drafts and cheques written by the law firm of Brogdin and Boulton, 1857.

Sem título
Brown vs Warner Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.41 · Dossiê/Processo · 1859
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of the legal documents of James G. Brown vs. Pamelia Warner, executrix of the last will and testament of Ira Ferguson Soper,1859.

Sem título
Bruton vs Molson Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.32 · Dossiê/Processo · 1857
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of legal papers in the case of Bruton vs. Molson, and includes a title search of Lot 3, Concession 2, Hope. Francis Henry Bruton was represented by Brogdin and Thomas Molson by James Scott.

Sem título
Bruton vs Orr Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.33 · Dossiê/Processo · 1857
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of common pleas and notice of trial of Francis Henry Bruton vs. Robert Orr, 14 Mar 1857. Francis Henry Bruton was represented by George Brogdin.

Sem título
Carveth et al vs McLean Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.38 · Dossiê/Processo · 1858
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of documents regarding Carveth et al vs McLean. A. G. McLean owed money to John and Joseph Carveth. John and Joseph Carveth, as the plaintiffs were represented by George Brogdin. John Carveth was a butcher with a stall at the Market Building (town hall) as indicated in the 1856-57 and 1857-58 directories.

Sem título
Carveth vs Mason Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.40 · Dossiê/Processo · 1858
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of common pleas between Carveth vs Mason, 8 Dec 1858. Sheriff's sale of Robert and James Mason's interest in a schooner being erected in the dockyard in Port Hope. The sale was advertised on 9 Dec 1858 for 10 days.

Sem título
Chambers vs Chambers Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.47 · Dossiê/Processo · 1860
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of notes regarding the case of Chambers vs. Chambers, 1860. The agreement between father and son was that Thomas was to only have the farm for two years. He paid nothing for the farm. Thomas' brothers, George and James challenged his claim and that they were the ones responsible for improving the property. George and James claimed that Thomas was only to hold the deed for two years.

Sem título
Clark vs Curtis Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.30 · Dossiê/Processo · 1856
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of papers regarding an unpaid account from George Curtis (1814-1863) with James A. Clark, 1856. James A. Clark was the proprietor of the Boston Boot & Shoe store on Walton Street.

Sem título
Clark vs Hazelton Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.28 · Dossiê/Processo · 1856
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a summons to appear for George Hazelton, regarding an over due account with James A. Clark, 1856. James A. Clark was the proprietor of the Boston Boot & Shoe store on Walton Street.

Sem título
Clark vs Money Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.27 · Dossiê/Processo · 1856
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of papers regarding the payment due on shoes to James A. Clark by John Money, 1856. James A. Clark was the proprietor of the Boston Boot & Shoe store on Walton Street.

Sem título
Clark vs Rogers Legal Documents
CA ON00154 2007.34-2007.34.1.26 · Dossiê/Processo · 1856
Parte de George Brogdin fonds

File consists of a summons to appear in case of James A. Clarke vs. Andrew Rogers, 1856. James A. Clark was the proprietor of the Boston Boot & Shoe Store on Walton Street.

Sem título